For your convenience, all Reader’s Forum submissions are separated by the ## symbol.
In response to Feature Writer Terri Winaught – So Tragic and Preventable, Beth wrote:
If I were sighted and if I chose to drive, I would not talk on a cell or text, I would not use ham equipment while driving, and I would not have a radio or other audio entertainment on. When you are in charge of a ton or two of steel, your rapt attention is indicated. Even years before onset of my severe hearing disability, my thought has been that people who have less than good vision should not travel alone. Why do people feel they have to prove themselves? We are human beings, not human doings. The dangers are many to solo travel, whether with a dog or cane: Drunk or distracted drivers, weather impediments, “right turn on red”, traffic overload, quiet cars, roundabouts, curb cuts, and I’m sure there are more, such as mugging potential. Sighted people should not travel alone either, also for these reasons, police will tell you that, I have heard it on the news.
##
In response to Feature Writer Terri Winaught – So Tragic and Preventable, Marie wrote:
Just what we need: another unnecessary law. Why can’t sighted people sit still during bus rides and so on? Do they have to use their cell phones every single second? There is no common sense: If you cannot walk and chew gum at the same time, and doing so would make it unsafe for you to travel, just sit still and concentrate on the one thing you can do without endangering yourself. Even though I cannot drive, I don’t use my cell phone while riding. I wait till I get home before I get back to anyone. No one needs to hear my conversation out there in public. As for texting, I’m not into that. I prefer to send email. Sighted people are too distracted by too much technology. That is why we have yet another unnecessary law. And there are more of them as the years go by, all because of lack of common sense.
##
In response to Op Ed with Bob Branco – Is it Work From Home or a Scam? Beth wrote:
I have found 2 legit job search sites and they are great:
https://www.elance.com/php/landing/main/login.php?crypted=cGVyc2lzaWQ9MzUyMzIwNTIz
https://www.flexjobs.com/login
##
In response to Op Ed with Bob Branco – Is it Work From Home or a Scam? Linda wrote:
The question was asked, “How do you know that some work at home businesses are legitimate and can help a blind person?”
The very first thing I consider is, are you being charged to get into the business? If you are, how much, and what is the company actually giving you in return? I wouldn’t fall for a company that insists that you make a large initial investment, sometimes actually receiving nothing in return but training. I am visually impaired but on Social Security Disability. For now, those who are on SSDI can still work and earn a certain amount of money each month without jeopardizing that income. So I feel quite safe in seeking to do what I can to increase my income.
I am a Scentsy consultant. I paid approximately one hundred and fifteen dollars to join the business, but believe I received that same amount of materials to start my business immediately. I do pay ten dollars for a web site every month. That is optional, but I choose to do it that way. The web site is very good, and the areas that are not completely available to the blind are being worked on at this time, as there are several blind consultants who want to have full accessibility. It is definitely possible for a blind person to order from the website. The person whom I joined under told me right up front, “This is not a get rich quick scheme. Your business will build slowly, but it will build.” And, of course, it depends on how much time you put into it.
My husband is sighted, and he assists me in different areas. It is nice, for example, if I am displaying my products at a booth, to have someone there with me to spot people who may be looking at my products if I am unaware of it because of the noise around me. Also, he can check checks that are written, etc. You don’t need an assistant all of the time though, and can do most promotion on your own. So some people may perhaps find a friend who will assist from time to time, or hire someone.
I am in this business in the hopes that eventually it will net me a fair amount each month. But, I’m also in it because I really love the products and can therefore enthusiastically endorse them, and because the company has true integrity. Please check out my web site and read my story. If you like fragrances, you will be in seventh heaven. www.SafeCandlesKY.com
I am Linda Stewart. I have four people as downline, two who live here in Lexington, Kentucky, and one who lives in Idaho and one in California. We can keep in touch very easily over the phone and all help each other.
Linda Stewart
www.SafeCandlesKY.com
##
In response to Op Ed with Bob Branco – Is it Work From Home or a Scam? Marie wrote:
As for those work-at-home schemes: My first sighted husband got me mixed up in some of those crappy scams. They are nothing more than scams; don’t get involved in them; you are throwing away the very little money you have on envelopes and stamps and all that. They don’t materialize into work of any kind. Avoid chain letters; Other scams include those companies that advises people not to pay their mortgages and claim to reduce your debts into lower payments. I have heard so many of those commercials on Sirius XM. I don’t even understand why that service has to broadcast these commercials. That is another thing I would never, ever do. Avoid email spam that also advertise this. Filter them so you don’t even get them anywhere near your Inbox on your Internet provider’s server; you don’t need to clog your Inbox with that junk. They make no money for anyone.
##
In response to Feature Writer Steven Famiglietti – JAWS 13 New Features: Part Two, Bill wrote:
I want to comment on the article about jaws and how expensive the upgrades are. It is a sad thing that we have to pay so much for something which is vital to us to do work on the computer. The manufacturers should be ashamed of themselves charging so much money. They sure have a monopoly.
##
In response to Feature Writer Steven Famiglietti – JAWS 13 New Features: Part Two, Pam wrote:
I agree the cost of upgrades is prohibitive and can’t help but resent the constant need to upgrade, especially when many reported problems simply aren’t fixed. I’d be interested to know how many readers experience silences when using Jaws 12. These silences are brief but infuriating and I have to say I never experienced these prior to recently upgrading from a very old version of Jaws.
Regards,
Pam MacNeill