Secondhand Smoke Alters Your Genes
Unfortunately, it has nothing to do with the smell of your favorite pair of pants. With laws going into effect that ban smoking in public places, it seems that legislators may have actually done some good for the public. What seemed like an obnoxious habit that non-smokers had to deal with that may have been harming our health has now been confirmed as much more harmful than was previously thought.
Researchers have discovered that exposure to secondhand smoke can actually alter your genetic makeup. For a long time there was a belief that prolonged exposure to secondhand smoke led to an increased chance for lung diseases and even lung cancer, but there was never any clinical proof of why that was occurring. Now, there’s a smoking gun–no pun intended.
Scientists working at the Weill Cornell Medical College performed a study with both non-smokers and smokers to determine the difference between those who smoke regularly, and those who are exposed to secondhand smoke in the environment. When the study was completed, it revealed that the non-smokers who only had minimal exposure to cigarette smoke, some of whom only had secondhand exposure, were found to have genetic changes in bronchial tissue that mimicked the tissue of regular smokers. These genetic changes represent the beginning stages for various lung diseases. While the study did not follow the subjects long enough to find out what affect those genetic changes had on their lung tissue, more studies are coming in the future.
The most interesting piece of the study was that it revealed how sensitive tissue is to any cigarette smoke at all and that exposure will result in changes at a genetic level.
While the study’s results do seem grim, it may actually help doctors to determine who is genetically predisposed to have an increased risk of lung disease and administer the proper drugs to counteract those symptoms. This will also add massive amounts of legitimacy to those endorsing public smoking bans who have been saying that secondhand smoke is harmful but simply haven’t had the proof to back that statement up. It seems that there is no question now.
To read the original article, please go to http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,2012103,00.html