For your convenience, all Reader’s Forum submissions are separated by the ## symbol.
In response to comments about taking notes in Braille, Richard wrote:
Someone in the Reader’s Forum questioned the use of the slate and stylus for college note taking.
I went through undergraduate and graduate school using a slate and stylus to take notes. I made up my own shorthand. I did not know Grade three.
There are now two books available from Web Braille on Grade three.
The Braille Code: A Guide to Grade Three Braille by Ruth Hayden: BRA03950 http://www.loc.gov/nls/braille/03950a01.brf and Key to Grade Three Braille by L. W. Rodenberg: BRA18832 http://www.loc.gov/nls/braille/18832a01.brf
I hope this helps.
Richard
##
In response to comments about taking notes in Braille, Jim wrote:
I received my B.A. degree from the College of Wooster, a liberal arts college in Ohio in June 1966.
I studied there between 1962 and 1966, taking Braille notes in my classes, especially history.
One of my professors was Dan Calhoun, a fast-talker. . My fellow students joked that if you dropped a pencil, you would miss a century. Braille slate writing was the most efficient way to keep up with this speed demon.
Using regular typing paper was a great way to build up speed. The thinner the paper, the faster a blind person can write. Remember, you won’t need to keep your notes past the final exam.
Second, remember that grade two Braille is merely a contracted shorthand. Regarding grade three Braille, you don’t need to take a course. While in college I created my own shorthand.
College students today can do likewise.
Jim Boswell, York, PA
##
In response to comments about taking notes in Braille, Virgil wrote:
Is it possible to keep up with college lectures with a slate and stylus? Absolutely! In 1955, I enrolled as a freshman at Roanoke College. I used the slate and stylus through four years of undergraduate school, three and a half years of coursework in graduate school at Vanderbilt University, eventually earning a Ph.D.
I never learned Grade 3, but the one chance that I had to see a code book, I saw that many of my personal abbreviations were the same. I used a Braille magazine to deaden the sound. Being able to take notes so rapidly requires a well-organized briefcase or backpack so that you can drop the finished page into its proper place and grab a clean sheet of paper very quickly.
Keep in mind that 57 years ago, the slate and stylus was the most common way of writing Braille. Would today’s high-school graduate be as proficient with a slate and stylus as my contemporaries were?
Finally, you can buy all of the necessary equipment for under $50, not the thousands of dollars that a Braille Note or a similar device would cost. If you have access to such a device, by all means use it. As much as I would like to have a Braille Note, I just can’t justify the expense. Were I not retired, I would probably own such a device, but not now when I am on a fixed income.
Virgil A. Cook
Associate Professor Emeritus of English
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, Virginia
##
In response to comments about taking notes in Braille, Dick wrote:
In response to David’s question about “Braille Thoughts From Past Issues,” I can report that I took notes in undergraduate and graduate school from 1967 to 1973. I graduated with High Honors. I am not going to say that it was easy, but it can be done. I used thin notebook paper in order to write much faster than one can write using Braille paper. Although I did not master grade 3 Braille, I did use a lot of made-up abbreviations: such as gov. for government; bus. for business; econ. for economics and hist. for history. etc. Moving the four-line slate down the paper and changing sheets of paper did slow me down a bit. It would probably have been easier if I had had a full page slate. However I don’t know if full-page slates were available at that time. Most instructors lectured at a normal pace, so notaking was fairly easy. I did have one instructor that lectured in a rapid-fire manner and I did have some difficulty keeping up with him. However, I passed all the courses he taught. The reason I didn’t want to record everything was that I would have had to listen to all of the classes again.
Dick Seifert, Little Rock, Arkansas.
##
In response to previous posts in the Reader’s Forum regarding Braille, Chris wrote:
There is an interesting debate within the blindness community and in the community of people working with us regarding Braille and its importance in the digital world in which we live. There is no question that we have seen a remarkable advancement in technology, including technology for the blind, and this technology will continue to advance and become more accessible. Although a lot of information isn’t accessible to us, just look at what we have in the way of technology that could easily make Braille obsolete: notetakers, screen readers, iDevices with VoiceOver, etc. All this technology is very good and allows us to access information like never before; don’t get me wrong there. But it can’t replace Braille! There is technology; there is audio; there are ways out there for us to access books besides hardcopy Braille; but in my opinion there is nothing that can replace Braille literacy. Yes, you can read books using audio (human-produced or synthesized,) but that’s not literacy! Anybody who is familiar with the English language (or whatever language the audiobook is produced in) enough to listen to a person talking can do that! But literacy, in my opinion, is the ability to communicate effectively and efficiently using some system of reading and writing. Even in today’s technologically-driven society, there is still a huge emphasis placed on literacy; most jobs require you to be able to read; you’re definitely not going to get into any kind of college without being able to read; literate people are typically regarded in society as educated and so are much more respected than those who can’t read. Even the technology that sighted people use is all print-based, in that the sighted user must read the print on the screen to get at any information on the computer/mobile device and to operate the device. So, we really are the only people whose form of literacy (and the teaching of it) is affected negatively by advancements in technology. However, this technology, in my view, doesn’t even come close to making Braille obsolete. As print is the form of literacy for the sighted, so Braille is the form of literacy for the blind! I believe we still need Braille and that it is very important to us! If you ask anybody who says we don’t need Braille anymore the question: “So should we stop teaching sighted children print,” you’d most likely get a resounding “No!” So why should we eliminate our form of literacy just because there’s technology that can replace it? Braille is still our form of literacy, and I think eliminating it or stopping the teaching of it would place all blind people at a severe disadvantage to their sighted peers.
Chris Nusbaum
Taneytown, Maryland
##
In response to the problems with a street crossing by Howard Geltman in a previous Reader’s Forum, David wrote:
Howard Geltman might want to talk to his local media including the local TV news, the city’s traffic management department and any other interested blind people. Either the lights are set too short, or the drivers are in need of some serious education. I wish all the talking signals would now say the street that it is now safe to cross. We have a signal on the corner of Moss and Alexander and you have to listen and remember which tone or chirp indicates which street is safe to cross. It helps, but I still have to be very careful because it’s a busy intersection. I doubt I’d even attempt it without the audible cue because of the confusion I have with right on red which they should toss out if they ever get alternative energy in place–it was brought in during the OPeC Embargo of 1973 as a fuel saver. I have nearly been hit by right on red drivers not noticing I was beginning to cross the street during several mobility lessons. Needless to say, this did not help my confidence and caused me to realize if I got hurt, no blind organization would support me let alone any member of the sighted public as they think we can’t travel safely though we now have blind O&M instructors.
##
In response to the problems with a street crossing by Howard Geltman in a previous Reader’s Forum, Edward wrote:
You should find out how people are crossing the street. Are they walking quickly? The best long term solution is to contact the town administrator. Request them to lengthen the period of the lights changing. This would allow you to cross the road with enough time.
##
In response to the problems with a street crossing by Howard Geltman in a previous Reader’s Forum, Patty wrote:
In response to your thoughts on crossing busy lights, something you should know. Once you have the right of way when crossing at a light, and are out in the street, you continue to have the right of way until you have completed your street crossing. At least that is the law in the state I am in.
If you feel that drivers at this particular crossing are not being sensitive to your needs, or the law, you might want to get the police to check out that crossing while you’re crossing it, and you also might want to check your state laws, and if they are as I suspect then you might want to try and contact a local source of media and do an article on the bothersome problem. I have found that doing articles is a good way to begin the awareness process.
Patty Fletcher
Volunteer Coordinator For 2-1-1/Contact Concern
http://www.contactconcern.org
##
In response to Op Ed with Bob Branco – Verizon Behind the Times, Michelle wrote:
I am writing to comment on Bob Branco’s article regarding Verizon. I have had better luck with the general Verizon staff/technical support personnel than I have had with the office for disabilities. That’s not to say that all tech support people are great, but mostly what it takes is patience on the part of the staff to work through issues with adaptive technology. Also if a person has Verizon internet service the tech support personal can access your computer remotely and generally this will help fix the problem. As far as sensitivity training goes this could be done initially when a person is hired by the higher level staff. Like I said before the biggest issues are awareness of disabilities and patience. One would think the important thing is to help one person solve a problem not as many people as possible.
Michelle from Pennsylvania
##
In response to Op Ed with Bob Branco – Verizon Behind the Times, Beth wrote:
I am a Cox customer, they have no special office for the disabled and, when I have a technical issue, we do just fine. I tell them and remind them multiple times that I cannot provide info on the status of lights on my PC or cable modem and I also ask that they give me keystrokes to try, which they do without difficulty. Not being a mind-reader, I do not know others’ attitudes when seeking customer support, but let’s assume the customer service people can help us, just tell them what we can offer regarding info and what we need from them regarding instructions.
##
In response to Feature Writer Ann Chiappetta – Project Gutenberg, Chris from the UK wrote:
I love Project Gutenberg. First of all I have been able to re-discover authors I read as a child and teenager. Then there are books written on topics I’m interested in which I could never have accessed at a public library. Not only are there titles which are interesting because of their subject, but sometimes they’re the books written by explorers, botanists, etc. I’ve come across some real gems!
What do I read them on?
I never downloaded the PC Kindle application, but my husband bought me the 3G Kindle last Easter. I thought he was going to take up reading more seriously – but he isn’t a book reader by nature for relaxation. He has a serious visual impairment which makes reading very tiring: for preference he prefers to watch rather than listen. I don’t know if this is because he’s a professional sound engineer and his ears probably get enough sound on a busy day or not.
Although I have used the male voice and can live with it, I can’t be doing with the female voice. Fortunately I am able to read print at a reasonable size still so this is how I use Kindle. Last summer I moved from the PC platform to the Apple IMac and have downloaded the Kindle application for that. This gives me different books (or sometimes the same) to those for Kindle because the IMac takes the ‘Mac mobile’ format. I have also got the IPad but I haven’t yet got as far as investigating IBooks and Project Gutenberg.
Are there downsides? Yes. The quality of the transcription of the materials can be ‘iffy’. I haven’t read enough books to give a percentage but one I have read had a section which was unreadable and one other will probably defeat me if it doesn’t improve in the first quarter. Reading in print is a lot easier than listening of course so a book like the second one would have been unusable within the first pages. Which isn’t good.
I can’t speak for using smart phones etc as I don’t have one, nor would I as I don’t really use a mobile phone much. Although I know several people who use smart phones to read, I don’t think they use Gutenberg. If you want to read ‘old’, this is where to go for first forays, if you want ‘new’, don’t do Gutenberg.
Sincerely Chris
##
In response to Feature Writer John Christie – A Dream Realized for Blind Musicians Everywhere, Bill wrote:
It was certainly a pleasant and unexpected surprise to find feature Writer John Christie’s article “A Dream Realized for Blind Musicians Everywhere” in your Jan. 23, 2012, issue. I certainly appreciate his kind words. It is now over 20 years since I left my “real job” and started Dancing Dots and it has indeed been a great adventure.
Before founding Dancing Dots, I worked for almost ten years for the Sun Oil Company, or Sunoco as it is also known, and not for Sun Micro Systems as some online sources erroneously show. In addition to the online sources listed by Mr. Christie, readers might enjoy listening to an archive of my interview with Billy Brookshire of the Hadley School found at http://www.hadley.edu/PastSeminars.asp
Under the link entitled: Braille Music Technology Audio
I demonstrated some of our software and played a few musical excerpts produced with our accessible audio production solution, CakeTalking for SONAR.
CakeTalking was actually developed by David Pinto, a gifted musician and programmer from southern California. Dancing Dots serves as his exclusive, worldwide distributor.
Thanks for all you do to publish the E-mail edition of the Matilda Ziegler Magazine. I enjoy browsing through it each week and often learn something new.
Sincerely,
Bill McCann
President
Dancing Dots
www.DancingDots.com
##
Jim Boswell wrote in to say:
What can we learn from the Giants?
New York Giants Coach Tom Coughlin gave us his philosophy in one sentence: “All things are possible for those who believe.” Football pundits discounted the Giants’ chances of making the playoffs on Christmas Eve. On that day they had a .500 record, 7 wins, 7 losses.
Coach Coughlin inspired his Giants to win one game at a time. They defeated the Jets on Christmas Eve. New Year’s Day they defeated the Dallas Cowboys, 31-14. That win gave them the NFC East Championship.
Then came their playoff run: 24-2 over the Atlanta Falcons; 37-20 over the Green Bay Packers; 20-17 in overtime over the San Francisco 49ers. That led to last night’s Super Bowl XLVI, where they overcame an 8-point deficit against the New England Patriots. Two Lawrence Tynes field goals closed the gap to 17-15. Then Ahmed Bradshaw scored the winning touchdown with 57 seconds to go in the game.
New York Giants defeated New England Patriots, 21-17.
When their backs were against the wall, when they had to win six straight games, the Giants overcame adversity by believing in themselves.
In the same way, we who are blind and visually impaired will overcome adversity by believing in ourselves.
We can learn from the Giants by remembering that all things are possible for those who believe.