I’ve gotten feedback from many of you requesting that I get rid of the proposed topics and allow the readers to submit anything that they would like included in the magazine. After consulting multiple people, I’ve decided that this section of the magazine belongs to all of you, and you should feel unencumbered when writing your submissions. That said, I would like to see the reader’s forum reflect on the content presented in the magazine so that the submissions have a clear context. Though, if something does come up that you feel the need to talk about and it hasn’t appeared in the magazine, don’t hesitate to submit it to me and I’ll look it over.
With the reader’s forum transitioning back to its former structure, its strength in the magazine will greatly depend on you. I would really like to see this section become something overflowing with comments and I encourage you all to submit to it when you can. Again, submissions will be accepted via email or on the website by commenting on a particular article. Also, from now on, the reader’s forum will appear in the magazine only when there are enough submissions to warrant its inclusion. If submissions are scant, then I’ll save what I do receive for a time when more have come in and will make for a more valuable portion of the magazine.
I hope this change pleases you all and that it will stimulate those of you who have been waiting to add something to it but did not relate or enjoy the topics that I had proposed. I also appreciate your patience as I tried to figure out how this would work best. You’re a great audience.
Moving on, I did receive some entries last week that pertained to both the topic I had proposed as well as other articles in the magazine. The entries I received are below.
I have been watching the Olympics off and on, particularly the figure skating which I enjoy as a totally blind person because of the music and commentary. One disappointment though has been that special segments featuring people speaking languages other than English not being translated in an auditory fashion, so there have been whole segments that were entirely out of my reach. It used to be that there would be interpretation as well as the visual input on the screen. I tried to contact NBC about this but could never get to a feedback form to express my concern.
Sharon Strzalkowski
In response to the February 22nd question about coverage of the Olympics, I think that MSNBC did an excellent job by providing ongoing descriptions of the Hockey competitions taking place. During previous years, I have paid little attention to Olympic coverage, but am glad I did this year and was pleasantly surprised by the excellence of the coverage.
From Terri Winaught,
Pittsburgh, PA
The story regarding police entering a home and waking the homeowner is absurd and extremely dangerous. It assumes that every law enforcement person is honest and trustworthy. This isn’t true for every one of them. And, as a blind person, if someone enters my home in the night or any other time, my intention will be to attack and do serious harm even kill before asking questions. Please follow this story and report on it in the future. I’m sure it will be repealed.
Greg
In response to the topic for reader’s forum here are some thoughts. I always enjoy following the Olympics both summer and winter games. I have two questions. One is why is there less media coverage for the Paralympics than the Olympics and will venues be definitely used for the community after the games? The Olympics will be in London in 2012 and I hope it will be a success and boost this country. I wonder what Canadians feel about the winter games in Vancouver?
Yours sincerely Franek Kozorowski, Hartleppool, UK
Hi Ross, you asked us to express our opinion regarding the article about police officers in one British town trying to get into people’s homes in the night, just to test the security of the homes. I hereby express my opinion about this. I think the plan to have police officers in one British town try to get into the doors and windows of people’s homes at night, to see if they are secure, is an absolutely terrible one! First, I see the dangers to the police officers, who may face loaded guns, knifes and large heavy objects, wielded by startled or frightened citizens. Could a person who might shoot such a police officer be charged? I don’t think so. How is such a person to know that this is not a real criminal? As a blind person, I can say that I would be very frightened and intimidated if someone attempted to break into my home, even if they were only testing the door. How would I know who this was? How would I know whether or not the person was wearing a uniform, even if he/she said this was a police test? It’s really a bad idea.
Tim Hendel
Huntsville, Alabama